updated style prop and added chip shadow #138
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to various SCSS and JavaScript files, primarily focusing on enhancing the styling and interactivity of button and chip components. Key changes include new color rules for button labels to ensure consistency with the primary theme, the addition of hover effects for clickable tags, and updates to the rendering logic in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
react/example/public/index.html (1)
Line range hint
1-30: Consider these improvements for better code quality and accessibility.While the overall structure of the HTML file is good, here are some suggestions for improvement:
Add a language attribute to the tag for better accessibility:
<html lang="en">Remove commented-out code to keep the file clean and maintainable. If these lines are needed for reference, consider moving them to a separate documentation file.
Consider adding a meta description tag for SEO purposes:
<meta name="description" content="Brief description of your DIGIT application">Would you like me to provide a cleaned-up version of the HTML file with these improvements?
react/ui-components/src/atoms/Chip.js (1)
Line range hint
24-33: Consider moving IconRender function outside the componentThe
IconRenderfunction is currently defined inside the component, which means it will be recreated on every render. For better performance, consider moving this function outside the component or memoizing it usinguseCallbackif it depends on props.Example:
const IconRender = React.useCallback((iconReq, isErrorTag) => { const iconFill = isErrorTag ? "#B91900" : "#787878"; return iconRender( iconReq, iconFill, "1.25rem", "1.25rem", "" ); }, []);react/css/src/digitv2/components/chipV2.scss (1)
49-51: Approved: Enhanced hover effect for clickable tagsThe addition of a hover effect for clickable tags is a good improvement to the user interface, providing clear visual feedback for interactive elements. This aligns well with the PR objective of updating the style prop.
Some suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider using a theme variable for the shadow color instead of a hardcoded value to ensure consistency with the overall design system.
- Verify if the specific box-shadow values (0.125rem, 0.25rem) align with any existing design guidelines for consistency across components.
Here's a potential refactor to use a theme variable for the shadow color:
&.clickable:hover{ - box-shadow: 0.125rem 0.125rem 0.25rem 0rem #36363633; + box-shadow: 0.125rem 0.125rem 0.25rem 0rem theme(digitv2.lightTheme.shadow-color, #36363633); }This assumes that there's a
shadow-colorvariable in the theme. If not, consider adding one to maintain consistency across the application.react/css/src/digitv2/components/buttonsV2.scss (1)
Line range hint
1-524: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplicationWhile the overall structure and theming approach in this file are consistent and well-organized, there are opportunities to reduce code duplication. Consider extracting common styles shared across different button types (e.g.,
.digit-button-primary,.digit-button-secondary,.digit-button-tertiary) into mixins or placeholder classes. This refactoring could improve maintainability and make it easier to apply consistent changes across all button types in the future.For example, you could create a mixin for common button properties:
@mixin button-base { @apply text-center cursor-pointer outline-none flex max-w-full items-center justify-center h-10; width: fit-content; padding-left: theme(digitv2.spacers.spacer6); padding-right: theme(digitv2.spacers.spacer6); gap: theme(digitv2.spacers.spacer2); min-width: 6.5625rem; }Then use it in your button classes:
.digit-button-primary { @include button-base; background-color: theme(digitv2.lightTheme.primary-1); // ... other specific styles } .digit-button-secondary { @include button-base; background-color: white; border: 0.063rem solid theme(digitv2.lightTheme.primary-1); // ... other specific styles }This approach would make the code more DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) and easier to maintain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
react/css/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonreact/example/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonreact/modules/core/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonreact/modules/sample/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonreact/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonreact/ui-components/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- react/css/src/digitv2/components/buttonsV2.scss (1 hunks)
- react/css/src/digitv2/components/chipV2.scss (1 hunks)
- react/example/public/index.html (1 hunks)
- react/ui-components/.storybook/preview-head.html (1 hunks)
- react/ui-components/public/index.html (1 hunks)
- react/ui-components/src/atoms/Chip.js (1 hunks)
- react/ui-components/src/hoc/FormComposerV2.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- react/ui-components/.storybook/preview-head.html
- react/ui-components/public/index.html
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
react/example/public/index.html (1)
12-12: LGTM! Verify compatibility with the updated CSS package.The update of the @egovernments/digit-ui-components-css package from version 0.0.2-beta.38 to 0.0.2-beta.39 aligns with the PR objective of updating styles. This minor version bump suggests incremental changes.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that the new version doesn't introduce any breaking changes or unexpected behavior in the application's UI. Consider running the following commands to check for any potential issues:
✅ Verification successful
Compatibility with the updated CSS package verified. No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential UI regressions after CSS update # Test: Search for any TODO comments or console logs related to UI issues rg --type html --type javascript --type typescript "TODO.*UI|console\.log.*UI" # Test: Look for any recent changes in UI-related files that might be affected by the CSS update git log -n 5 --pretty=format:"%h - %s" --grep="UI\|style\|css"Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential UI regressions after CSS update # Test: Search for any TODO comments or console logs related to UI issues with corrected file types rg --type html --type js --type ts "TODO.*UI|console\.log.*UI" # Test: Look for any recent changes in UI-related files that might be affected by the CSS update git log -n 5 --pretty=format:"%h - %s" --grep="UI\|style\|css"Length of output: 396
react/ui-components/src/atoms/Chip.js (1)
45-48: Improved component flexibility with conditional "clickable" classThe addition of the
${onTagClick || onClick ? "clickable" : ""}condition in the className prop enhances the component's flexibility. This change allows the Chip to visually indicate when it's interactive based on the presence of eitheronTagClickoronClickprops, which aligns well with the PR objective of updating style properties.The implementation is clean and follows React best practices for conditional rendering.
react/css/src/digitv2/components/buttonsV2.scss (1)
158-160: LGTM: Improved visual consistency for secondary button labelThe addition of the
.digit-button-labelrule within.digit-button-secondaryenhances the visual consistency of the button. By setting the label color totheme(digitv2.lightTheme.primary-1), it now matches the border color, creating a more cohesive look.react/ui-components/src/hoc/FormComposerV2.js (1)
347-347: Verify thestylesprop usage in theHeadercomponentThe prop name has been changed from
styletostyles. This might be inconsistent with React's standard prop naming convention, which typically usesstylefor inline styles. Please confirm if this change is intentional and if theHeadercomponent is designed to accept astylesprop instead ofstyle.To verify the correct prop name, please run the following command:
This will help us confirm whether the
Headercomponent expects astylesprop or astyleprop.✅ Verification successful
stylesProp Usage Verified in theHeaderComponentThe
Headercomponent is designed to accept astylesprop, as confirmed by its definition inreact/ui-components/src/atoms/Header.js. The change fromstyletostylesinFormComposerV2.jsis intentional and aligns with theHeadercomponent's expectations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the Header component definition ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const Header = $_' react/ui-components/src/atoms/Header.jsLength of output: 579
| className={`digit-tag ${isErrorTag ? "errortag" : ""} ${hideClose ? "noClose" : ""} ${!iconReq ? "noIcon" : ""} ${onTagClick || onClick ? "clickable" : ""} ${ | ||
| className ? className : "" | ||
| }`} | ||
| style={tagStyles} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility with ARIA attributes
To improve the accessibility of the Chip component, consider adding appropriate ARIA attributes. For instance, you could add role="button" and aria-disabled={disabled} when the chip is clickable.
Example:
<div
className={`digit-tag ${isErrorTag ? "errortag" : ""} ${hideClose ? "noClose" : ""} ${!iconReq ? "noIcon" : ""} ${onTagClick || onClick ? "clickable" : ""} ${
className ? className : ""
}`}
style={tagStyles}
role={onTagClick || onClick ? "button" : undefined}
aria-disabled={disabled}
>
{/* ... rest of the component ... */}
</div>| {props.heading && <Header style={{ ...props.headingStyle }}> {props.heading} </Header>} | ||
| {props.description && <Header> {props.description} </Header>} | ||
| {props.heading && <Header styles={{ ...props.headingStyle }}> {props.heading} </Header>} | ||
| {props.description && <Header styles={{ ...props.descriptionStyles }}> {props.description} </Header>} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent prop naming for styling across components
Similar to the previous line, the prop name has been changed from style to styles. This change should be applied consistently across all components that accept styling props.
To maintain consistency and prevent potential styling issues, consider the following options:
- If the
Headercomponent is designed to accept astylesprop, update all other component instances in the file to usestylesinstead ofstyle. - If this change was unintentional, revert both lines 347 and 348 to use
styleinstead ofstyles.
Example of option 1:
-{props.heading && <Header styles={{ ...props.headingStyle }}> {props.heading} </Header>}
-{props.description && <Header styles={{ ...props.descriptionStyles }}> {props.description} </Header>}
+{props.heading && <Header style={{ ...props.headingStyle }}> {props.heading} </Header>}
+{props.description && <Header style={{ ...props.descriptionStyles }}> {props.description} </Header>}Please review and apply the appropriate change to ensure consistency throughout the codebase.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
No description provided.